FENCE MAGAZINE

PORTAL

ABOUT

EVENTS

STAFF

CONTACT

SUPPORT

FENCE BOOKS

NEW YORK STATE WRITERS INSTITUTE

LA PRESSE

NATIONAL POETRY SERIES

CONSTANT CRITIC

OTHER LINKS

ARCHIVES

Operations

Recently, Rebecca solicited all editors, past and present, of Fence to write essays about their editing practices. Though I began the writing process thinking I would write a lot about audience – and more specifically, how coterie is fetishized in the writing community in a way that reminds me of the developmental theories around masochism first articulated by D. W. Winnicott, I ended up writing, much more boring, about “operations” – all the things we do here at Fence to produce the material object of the magazine itself. I focused in particular on our response times – how long it takes us to let someone know we are interested (or not) in their piece. I suggested, in this essay, that if we could guarantee submitters that we would get back to them one way or another within a month, we could improve the overall quality of our slush-pile because people would submit to us first, knowing they weren’t risking the sort of 6 month or year-long wait they look forward to from most publications. When this issue was brought up in an editorial meeting a couple of months later, someone pointed out that we accept simultaneous submissions, so it shouldn’t matter how long we take to get back to a person, since we’re not asking for exclusivity in the first place. I argued that there was a psychology to the notion of rapid response time – it’s not just that people would feel they weren’t losing time waiting around for a slow editorial board, but also that they would generally think of Fence as organized, together, and engaged… Curious what all your blog-readers (if you exist) think about these highly operational considerations…

2 Responses to “Operations”

  1. J.H.F. Says:

    I’ve recently begun submitting poems to magazines, & the quirks of the processes are interesting in their variety from venue to venue. A fast response time, in my opinion, does reflect an admirable seriousness & organization on the journal’s part. It’s tough when there is no response time listed in submission guidelines; even a rough estimate would be appreciated. I would guess that most poets are organized, methodical people–even if it may not seem so superficially–as poetry is about the organization/presentation of material.

  2. Anonymous Says:

    Quick responses are a relief, even when notices of rejection. One can put it to bed and move on. I once received a response to an (email) submission within the day. This is probably more or less a fluke (it was a notice of rejection, not like the poems were so jaw-dropping they had to let me know right away) but anything on the inside of a month even is really quite something. I do view that journal in a *sweeter* light.

Leave a Reply